2/2 ‘Sgt. Pepper’ turns 50 - by Jon Pareles (ビートルズ)

In 1967, candy-colored psychedelic pop and rock provided a short-lived but euphoric diversion from conflicts that would almost immediately resurface: the Vietnam War and America's racialtension. “Sgt. Pepper” remains tied to that brief moment of what many boomers remember as innocence and possibility - the feeling capturedperfectly in “Getting Better,” even as Lennon taunts, “It can't get no worse.

Yet for the  Beatlesthat instant of cultural innocence was astrategic artistic opening. By 1967, the Beatles were by no means ingenuous.They had already been through exponentially expanding pop stardom, endless screaming crowds and the fierce American backlash against Lennon's flippant1966 remark that the Beatles were “more popular than Jesus now.”
After three years of hectic touring and recording, and of jaw-droppingly rapid development as songwriters amid tempest, the Beatles decided to get off the road, where they couldn't hear themselves play, and to focus on making studio albums. They took five months
an eternity at the time, now barely a pause for a new wardrobe and sponsorship deal to record the “Sgt. Pepper” album,“Strawberry Fields” and “Penny Lane.” With “Revolver,” they had embraced studio surrealism and partly jettisoned love songs, and for its successor they wouldhave more time to think and tinker. Yet they still worked amazingly fast,harnessing the era's primitive technology to pack wild ideas onto four-tracktape. Each “Sgt. Pepper” song creates its own sonic realm, far removed from thelive Beatles’ two guitars, bass and drums.

They gave themselves a usefully loose concept. They would become Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, setting aside all outside expectations of the Beatles and treating the album as a performance complete with canned audience reaction: a theatrical, distancingdevice

While the Beatles had traveled theworld, only “Within You Without You” flaunted the exotic. Mostly, Sgt.Pepper’s band was almost provincially British: wandering London in “A day inthe Life,” telescoping an entire middle-class English life (complete withprospective grandchildren) above a music-hall bounce in “When I’m 64.” Stalwart British brass answered the rowdy distorted guitar in “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts ClubBand”: “She’s Leaving Home” is stately waltz set to a harp and parlor orchestra that might have accompanied high tea. One of the Beatles’ paths forward led through an expanded embrace of the past.
They rejected any generation gap.The album cover set the 1967 Beatles, with their mustaches and shiny mock band uniforms, alongside their suited, mop-topped pop-star wax statues so recent, yet so distant and cultural figures like Karlheinz Stockhausen, Sonny Liston and W.C. Fields, a rightful claim to adultsignificance. But the LP was also packaged with cardboard cutouts a mustache, military stripes like something for children. While theSummer of Love nurtured hippie dreams of creating a new world, the Beatlesreminded listeners of how entrenched the old one was, and how comforting.
But at the same time, “Sgt.Pepper” gazed forward in sound and sense. The Beatles and their producer,George Martin, concocted eerie, unforgettable sounds from hand-played instruments and analog tape tricks; “Strawberry Fields,” which miraculously interweaves two arrangements of the song in two keys, remains a marvel ofinternal disorientation. And despite all the vintage references, “Sgt. Pepper”situated its songs  in the present: sometimes a rushed, workaday world andsometimes a mind-altered escape. The album’s magnificent, sobering finale, “ADay in the Life,” understood and anticipated the ethical and emotional ambiguities of aworld perceived through mass media, even back when the news media was just newspapers, radio and television.

“Sgt. Pepper” had an immediate,short-lived bandwagon effect, as some late-1960s bands sought to figure out howto make those strange Beatles sounds, and others got more studio time and backup musicians than they needed. Artistic pretentions also notched up. And the pendulum started its long-term swings: progressive rock and corporate would be  swatted back by punk and disco, hair metal would be blasted by grungeand hip-hop. The studio artifice that “Sgt. Pepper” daringly flaunted has long since become commonplace.
Yet while “Sgt. Pepper” has been both praised and blamed for raising the technical and conceptual ante on rock, its best aspect was much harder to propagate. That was its impulsiveness, its lightheartedness daring, its willingness to try the odd sound and the unexpected idea. Listening to “Sgt.Pepper” now, what comes through most immediately is not the pressure theBeatles put on themselves or the musicianly challenges they surmounted. It's the sheer improbability of the whole enterprise, still guaranteed to raise as mile 50 years on.